85. The Person You Think You Are Dies Every Night | Relative vs. Absolute Knower – BG, CH4, V19

Summary:

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 4, Verse 19: The wise one is free from binding desire and personal will because no entity truly stands to gain or lose – the body-mind's desires continue functioning, but without identification or pressure. The fire of knowledge severs connection to the individual self's vast accumulated tendencies (sañcita) built across many lives, along with the new tendencies (āgāmi) being formed in this lifetime. What remains is only the ripened portion of tendencies (prārabdha) already assigned to this life – the circumstances, temperament, and inclinations that gave rise to this particular body and existence – which continues to be exhausted naturally. The liberated one acts not to validate, prove, or fulfill any personal lack, but simply because there is no reason not to, all the while knowing the actor, action, and result are ultimately illusory.


Revision of Verse 18:

“Jnani Sees Actionlessness (Consciousness) in Action”

In every action, there is a knowing. That knowing presence is you; also called the absolute knower (sakshi  / alupta-drk), which is not referring to the relative knower called pramata / jnata / drasta.

Absolute Knower vs. Relative Knower:

Demonstration 1:

Close eyes, put attention on elephant, then front of house entrance, then image of loved one.

Notice how the relative knower changes depending on WHAT it knows, and knows for a certain DURATION.

For instance, the relative knower is filled with elephant knowledge for 5 sec, then elephant knowledge vanishes, replaced by house-entrance knower, etc. While awareness (ever-present Knower) is throughout entire experience.

Demonstration 2:

Let's take the waking-knower. It knows its house is in ___, and is good in ___, not into ___, loves ___, and dislikes ___. So the waking-knower has an identity based on those factors.

Then the waking-knower is replaced by a dream-knower. The dream-knower has an entirely different complex from the waking-knower. 

Both knowers believe they are independent, self-existent beings. But in reality, they both depend on presence of the mind. For instance, during deep sleep, mind is absent, thus the waking-knower and dream-knower are resolved.  

Additionally, the knowers depend on the dream and waking state for their existence. The dream state sublates the waking-knower. And the waking state sublates the dream-knower. 

Demonstration 3:

Additionally, the relative knower takes time-bound role. For instance, takes holiday-enjoyer-role for 1 week. Sufferer-role for a week. Concerned-role for 10 min. Shy-introvert within group of new people for 1 hour. Confident-warrior within group of friends for 5 hours. Throughout all roles, there’s a non-interfering awareness, an absolute-knower that knows about the relative-knower changing roles.

Summary:
      1. Relative Knower = state of mind
      2. Absolute knower = the presence in whose presence the state of mind is known to be what it is.

“Jnani Sees Action in (so called) Actionlessness”

The wise person recognizes that any attempt by the relative-knower (doer) to “not do action,” is itself an action performed by the relative-knower (doer).

True actionlessness isn't achieved by not doing – but by owning up to your nature.

 

NEXT VERSE: Karma-phala for a jnani is burnt (disowned) by fire of knowledge…

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 4, Verse 19:

यस्य सर्वे समारम्भाः काम-सङ्कल्प-वर्जिताः ।
ज्ञान-अग्नि-दग्ध-कर्माणम् तम् आहुः पण्डितम् बुधाः ॥ ४-१९॥
yasya sarve samārambhāḥ kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ ।
jñāna-agni-dagdha-karmāṇam tam āhuḥ paṇḍitam budhāḥ ॥ 4-19॥

The one for whom all undertakings are free from (binding) desire and will, whose actions are burnt by the fire of knowledge, the sages call him as wise.

“Jnani’s Undertakings Are Free from Desire and Will”

When most people undertake activities, they do so with kāma (binding desire based on unmet needs) and saṅkalpa (will or determination – because, I, the individual, have something to gain from this).

This is the normal human experience before acting. Both are centred on “I” (jiva) who has something to gain/lose.

Whereas the jnani is free from binding desire (kama) and will (sankalpa) because:

    1. There’s no entity who stands to gain/lose. It is not Me who is benefitting, but the waking-character.
    2. Desiring/willing instrument (body-mind) is an incidental attribute, not my essential nature.

For the jnani's mind's desire and will continue to function, but there's no identification with them as “mine” – thus their body-mind operates without pressures (such as agenda or fear of losing something).

Examples:
    1. The jñānī becomes a teacher not because they need to teach, but simply because there are people who want to learn.
    2. Has a child not from feeling incomplete, but as part of natural family life.
    3. Earns money not for sake of validation, but what's necessary for livelihood.
In short: Ajnani vs. Jnani’s Actions
    1. Ajnani’s actions are done for sake of pleasing Me (body-mind); I want things to be like “this” for my fulfillment. Manipulates and changes situations. Does to prove, seek validation, get compliments, be seen and heard. Center is “I”.
    2. Jnani’s body-mind also acts, but not to please “I” (since self is already complete) – rather to do what is to be done for wellbeing of all.

Your Actions/Karma-Phalas Are Burnt (Disowned) by the Fire of Knowledge

Jnani is one whose karma-phalas (consequences of past actions waiting to fructify) are burnt (disowned) by the fire of knowledge [jñāna-agni-dagdha-karmāṇam].

What exactly is “burnt” or disowned because of which jnani no longer takes on a new body? Your “account” consisting of:

    1. Sañcita-karma:
      • Sancita is like a vast balance sheet of wise (punya / dharmic) and unwise (papa / adharmic) tendencies (samskaras) developed over many lives. Punya tends to ripen as supportive conditions and inner ease (sukha), while papam ripens as obstructive conditions that create friction or disease (duhkha) in your life.
    2. Āgāmi-karma (or kriyamāṇa-karma):
      • These are first time tendencies you're developing in this lifetime, which will become part of sancita tendencies. 
    3. Prārabdha-karma:
      • The small fraction of your sañcita tendencies that has “ripened” and is being exhausted (played out) in your current life. This is the karma that gave you this particular body and life circumstances. For example, suppose you got into spirituality in previous life. Thus you developed in previous life a “spiritual samskara”. We could say, it was a wise decision (punya). In this life, the “spiritual samskara” is assigned to you, thus making you effortlessly relate and be curious towards spiritual teachings. Meaning, prarabdha is forcing you to exhaust (play out) your spiritual tendencies developed previous life.
      • Prarabdha-karma is two things:
        1. Old debt to burn through: What house you've got in this life. However it is, whatever furniture is inside, or lack of it – however it smells – renovate it! Pointless complaining it's a crummy house. Even if you were given a castle, it's not necessarily an advantage, as it may lead to entitlement and superiority; detrimental traits for Vedanta. Point is, you're given a house (body, parents, birth place, gender, genes) upon birth, and you've earned it by your past actions. What are you going to do with what you've been given?  Therefore, prarabha-karma is old debt, a bill coming due. So when someone says “This is your karma”, that means, “This is consequence of your past actions!”. Follow this up with “What are you going to about it?”. 
        2. Past impressions: Prarabdha-karma is also inherited impressions from past life, manifesting as behaviors, thinking patterns, talents.
      • Example of what happens when two prarabdha karmas meet: Person’s prarabdha brings them impression of “trust = safe”, together with non-discernment. Whereas scammer’s prarabdha brings “trust = profit.” They meet, and a transaction happens. No villain, no victim, just two sets of prarabdha colliding. Person’s blind spot + his greed = loss. Scammer pays too – maybe next life, maybe this one. The order doesn’t care who “deserves” what. It just balances. His gain? Not victory, just temporary credit. And tomorrow? The numbers shift again. No one’s ahead forever. He pockets the cash, feels clever – until the next bill hits, like guilt, low self-esteem, paranoia, overconfidence which makes scammer get negligent and get caught. You can’t escape the bill. Thus don’t think of it as being punished/rewarded. It’s just precision, which we call Ishvara’s infallible order. 
For the ajnani:

For the person who lacks self-knowledge, the cycle of rebirth is endless: Prārabdha is experienced, new āgāmi tendencies are created, which makes the sañcita balance sheet even longer, thus necessitating a new body to continue exhausting those tendencies. Thus making the wheel of saṃsāra turn.

For the jnani:

Conversely, when the fire of knowledge dawns – connection to the jiva who has this account is severed. The sancita belongs to the jiva, that jiva I am not, thus I am discharged of jiva's sancita account.

Jivanmukta's Sancita is like a Roasted seed:

Jivanmukta's karmas become like a roasted seed (dagdha-bīja). A normal seed, when sown, germinates and produces fruit (new karma). But a roasted seed is incapable of germination. It can only be enjoyed for what it is.

Similarly, the results of actions of a jivanmukta's body-mind, do not come back to the jivanmukta (awareness). The jivanmukta's body-mind continues to experience the remaining prārabdha, while knowing “I am the untouched witness”.

This is the state of jīvan-mukta – liberated while living.

Why a Jivamukta Still Acts

If you are wise and free, why would you do anything? Why would a sage like Krishna teach, or Shankara/Vyasa write?

The wise person teaches or acts for one simple reason: because there is no reason not to.

    1. You do not do because you have a desire to “save the world.” How can you save the world when you yourself are dependent on the world for your food and shelter? “I have to save the world” complex shows ignorance of one’s interconnection to the whole – it even shows arrogance, seeing oneself as God. 
    2. You share because you have something to share, and someone needs it. It's that simple.

A jñānī can be a king like Janaka, a householder, or a silent monk. It all depends on their prārabdha (one’s inborn temperament, natural talents, family situation, and life circumstances). They may perform rituals or teach, not because they are bound to, but because they see no reason not to.

Meanwhile, jnani knows the actor (waking knower) is mithyā, the action is mithyā, and the result is mithyā. They depend on me, I don't depend on them.

NEXT VERSE: What is jnani’s attitude/mindset towards actions? Actions aren’t given up, only given up anxiety towards results of actions…

 

Course was based on Swami Dayananda (Arsha Vidya) home study course.

Recorded 1 March, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *