Mahabharata Symbolism: Pandu's Negligence of Shooting the Arrow (89)
Summary:
Lesson 89 speaks about negligence, what causes it, how to minimize it, and how it shapes our lives. We also speak of topic of bringing mindfulness/alertness into our lives.
- Topic since lesson 88 was on negligence. This lesson 89, finishes topic of negligence…
- Mindfulness / alertness
- Notice how society has gone from multitasking to Mindfulness (especially in corporate situations). Why has the focus changed?
- In multitasking, we're “not together”. So we don't feel satisfied, but also make mistakes. Miss details.
- Today's seminars are about mindfulness, because they notice multitasking isn't fulfilling, thus doesn't motivate employees to produce quality work.
- Can be mindful and do many But must be “together 100%” in any activity we do.
- In multitasking, we're “not together”. So we don't feel satisfied, but also make mistakes. Miss details.
- Example of how multi-tasking doesn't work: Listening, while thinking of whether what you said was appropriate. This means one is “not together” in their mental processes. It's impossible to enjoy the conversation of have a deep discussion like this.
- Notice how society has gone from multitasking to Mindfulness (especially in corporate situations). Why has the focus changed?
- Attachment determines reaction.
- What is attachment? It's a mechanical repetitive process. It's a result of subscribing to the “comfort zone”. It's closes the mind to learning and asking questions.
- What does the sage (who cursed Pāṇḍu) symbolize?
- Sage symbolizes one who is in touch with Īśvara. Even if good person (such as Pāṇḍu) exercises negligence, there are inescapable consequences.
- Sage symbolizes one who is in touch with Īśvara. Even if good person (such as Pāṇḍu) exercises negligence, there are inescapable consequences.
-
-
- Why kind of consequences? Depends on 2 types of negligence's:
-
-
-
-
- Out of assumption (mechanical approximation without taking a moment to check).
- EG: Pāṇḍu, toddler. Less severe.
- Having prior knowledge, but silences it with likes/dislikes. EG:
- Knowing I'll forget if don't write it down, but says “I'll remember this time“.
- Knowing this feeling in me, means my partner is uncomfortable, but consciously chooses to not do
- Floor cleaner knows floor slippery, doesn't put “Wet” sign.
- Know video-title will invoke negativity, but watch it anyway.
- Result of all examples above: Guilt. Weaker to say “No” next time. Severe punishment.
- Out of assumption (mechanical approximation without taking a moment to check).
- Both cases, Īśvara's laws of karma (cause-effect) brings suffering.
- Just playing role of king/parent/teacher is insufficient. What about personal growth?
- If unattended, your less-then-committed performance affects those associated to you.
-
-
- Other factors that influence neglect:
- Age EG: Toddler. That’s why punishment 18+ (in any culture).
- Feedback system. Let’s us learn. EG:
- Despite getting feedback from body, ignored. Later health problems.
- Despite getting feedback of uncertain economy, doesn't save for emergency
- Despite ongoing tension in relationship, doesn't bring it up. Hopes.
- Despite feeling more stuck/vulnerable in life, doesn't ask for advice.
- Feedback system. Let’s us learn. EG:
- Age EG: Toddler. That’s why punishment 18+ (in any culture).
-
-
- How to know if ignoring feedback-system? Postponement. EG:
- First learn Sanskrit language, then can study B.Gītā (manual on life).
- It's like saying:
- Before cooking a meal, must learn art of cookery.
- Before type one keystroke, must go to typing class.
- Before I can share my opinion, must learn to be charming.
- Before I can conceive child, must learn the psychology of children.
- It's like saying:
- First learn Sanskrit language, then can study B.Gītā (manual on life).
- How to know if ignoring feedback-system? Postponement. EG:
-
- Message of Mahābhārata: Even good people make mistakes. They're all good people, but still need to evolve.
- We have to refine our personality: Duryodhana > Arjuna > Krishna
- STORY CONTINUES: After Pāṇḍu death, it was thought his eldest son Yudhiṣṭhira should rule.
- But Duryodhana thought he should rule since (1) he was eldest of Dhṛtarāṣṭra (2) wasn’t blind.
- Dhṛtarāṣṭra happily agreed to Duryodhana’s ruling, knowing decision wasn’t correct, as Yudhiṣṭhira was more qualified.
- So Dhṛtarāṣṭra decided to give some part of kingdom to Yudhiṣṭhira, which was uninhabited and barren desert.
- Pāṇḍavas agreed. Though hard work, turned it into beautiful place.
- QUESTION 1:
- Why do you think Dhṛtarāṣṭra allowed Duryodhana to rule, and not Yudhiṣṭhira?
- He was nursing He felt for years he was deprived of his right to rule.
- He wanted to live his own dream through his own son.
- Passive-aggressive behavior: He fought for kingdom through his son.
- Why do you think Dhṛtarāṣṭra allowed Duryodhana to rule, and not Yudhiṣṭhira?
- QUESTION 2: Was it right that Pāṇḍavas accepted Dhṛtarāṣṭra's small land?
- EG: Yudhiṣṭhira was giving license to Duryodhana to act adharmic, each time Yudhiṣṭhira didn't stand up to his unfairness. Thus his power to say “no” weakens next time.
- Meaning even cultural message of “Let go, just surrender to the flow” isn't always healthy. You have to address appropriately with an educated buddhi.
- EG: Yudhiṣṭhira was giving license to Duryodhana to act adharmic, each time Yudhiṣṭhira didn't stand up to his unfairness. Thus his power to say “no” weakens next time.
- So Dhṛtarāṣṭra decided to give some part of kingdom to Yudhiṣṭhira, which was uninhabited and barren desert.
Keywords: bhagavad gita, pandu, ishvara, Yudhishthira, pandavas, dhritarashtra
—
Recorded 18 Aug, 2020