Brahman-Maya (Satya-Mithya) Relationship: Essence of Non-Duality in Upanishads (71)

Summary:

Lesson 71 revisits most important qualification, faith in Upanishads/Vedanta, without which tree of samsara can't be cut. Next we mention 5 glories/descriptions of Higher Reality (Awareness) and relationship with Lower Reality (apparently existent; maya).

Source: Bhagavad Gita, CH9 – verse 3, 4, 5, 6


REVISION:

  • In CH9, Krishna is focusing on Īśvara jñānam.
    • Dealing with:
      • Higher nature: parā-prakṛti in CH7.
        • Reality beyond conditions of time/space.
        • For this reason it is: division-less, changeless, timeless, space-less, Absolute.
      • Lower nature: aparā-prakṛti in CH7.
        • Relative empirical world within time/space.
        • Consequently, it’s subject to division/adjustment, influenced by variables, undergoes manifest/unmanifest.
    • Per Upaniṣad, higher nature: Brahman (or Ātman). Lower nature: Māyā.
    • Knowledge of:
      • Higher: vijñānam / advaitam.
      • Lower: jñānam / dvaitam.
      • Moreover, Krishna says he will deal with both.

 

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 9 – Verse 3:

aśraddadhānāḥ puruṣā dharmasyāsya parāntapa |
aprāpya māṃ nivartante mṛtyusaṃsāravartmani ||

Oh Arjuna! Those people who have no faith in this teaching continue certainly in the course of saṁsāra fraught with death without attaining me.

 

  • Despite glory of īśvara-jñānam and it’s gift of offering highest joy/security, and it’s FREE availability on internet / āśramās, many people REJECT it.
    • One reason: people don’t trust what is freely & easily available.
      • EG: Boy married without dowry = “Something fishy for boy being cheaply available”.
      • Reality is: Most essential (water, air, food) is free & taken for granted. While non-essential (jewelry, makeup, king size bed, public figure) is valued.
  • For such reason, aśraddadhānāḥ puruṣaḥ dharmasyāsya, many lack śraddha (faith; non-critical mind) in efficacy in īśvara jñānam.
  • What happens to them? Aprāpya mām, they lose opportunity to attain Me, the unlimited ānanda / security.
    • “Yea, BUT I can do this next life!”: No guarantee gaining human body, nor receiving conducive environment.
  • Finally, what is their state of affairs? nivartantē mṛtyusaṃsāravartmani, these folks remain in grip of spellbinding- saṃsāra, doing what? Acquiring-losing. Eternal struggle. (Punarapi jananam, punarapi maraṇam)
    • Folks also receive fresh doses of disease, decay, separation, loss – each lifetime!

 

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 9 – Verse 4:

mayā tatamidaṃ sarvaṃ jagadavyaktamūrtinā |
matsthāni sarvabhūtāni na cāhaṃ teṣvavasthitaḥ ||

All this Universe is pervaded by Me, whose form is unmanifest. All beings are in Me; still, I am not in them.

 

  • Krishna has finished glorification of Īśvara jñānam, and stated necessary qualification for this rāja-vidya; śraddha (non-critical mind).
    • Or anasūya in V1. Absence of ill-will.
      • SYMBOLISM:
        • Wife of Atri sage (Vedic era).
        • Transcended 3: wife = anasūya (freedom from ill-will, envy, judgement)
        • Not Transcended 3: wife = asūya (grumbling displeasure)
      • Central them of CH9 being V4-10. Gītā’s significant section contains essence of Upaniṣads. Krishna starts by revealing Īśvara’s higher nature.
  • GLORY/DEFINITION 1 of Īśvara’s higher nature: NOT perceptible to any sense organs. In contrast, vyakta is perceptible to indriyāni. EG:
    • If object has sound property: PERCEPTIBLE to ear.
    • Touch (tactile feedback) property: KNOWN through skin.
    • Shape/color/form property: NOTICED through eyes.
    • Taste property (saltiness, sourness, sweetness, bitterness): DETECTED by tongue.
    • Fragrance/aroma property: RECOGNIZED by nose.
    • Meaning, if experienced God at any time/form, it was lower nature ONLY. From Vedāntic angle, it was not higher Īśvara because experience is not here NOW. Sublime māyā (inspiring awe).
    • Then HOW to “experience” higher Īśvara?

      • Īśvara is not an OBJECT of experience, because God is avyaktam (non-perceptible).
      • Instead, Īśvara is ever-available as the conscious SUBJECT. What is nature of Subject? Illuminating-validating.
        • Illuminating-validating what specifically? Whatever experience is presented. Moods, thoughts, back pain, joys, memories.
    • CONCLUSION: Lord is never away. Nor will Lord ever come, because He never left.
  • GLORY 2 of Īśvara’s higher nature: tatam idam sarvam jagat: He is pervaded all over. (present past participle)
    • What does “all over” mean?
      • How is form of mountain determined? By evaluating it’s boundaries. Meaning form = boundary. Hence form can never be “all over”.
      • And since Īśvara is formless, Lord is boundless (all-overness).
    • QUIZ Q 1: “Is God in heaven?”. What is answer?
      • Wrong if just answer “yes” or “no”, and stop at that.
      • “God is indeed in heaven ALSO”. (Implying Īśvara is also here and now).
    • QUIZ Q 2: “What do we mean by “merging with Īśvara”?
      • Gaining wisdom that Lord has never been AWAY from self. Dropping notion of division = “merger”.
  • GLORY 3 of Īśvara’s higher nature: matsthāni sarvabhūtāni, whole world is resting in Me. I am supporter of the universe.
    • At same time, I am not supported by the world. I am never supported. But supportless supporter of whole universe.
  • GLORY SUMMARY:
    • Glory 1: Lord is formless. Avyaktam (not perceptible).
    • Glory 2: Lord is all-pervading. Sarvagatatvam (being everywhere, omnipresence).
    • Glory 3: Lord is support of all, the substratum of the mithyā universe. Jagat adhiṣṭhāna (Abode of world).

 

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 9 – Verse 5:

na ca matsthāni bhūtāni paśya me yogamaiśvaram |
bhūtabhṛnna ca bhūtastho mama”tmā bhūtabhāvanaḥ ||

In fact, the beings are not in Me. See My divine yoga. I, Myself am the creator of the beings and the sustainer of the beings; but (I am) not in the beings.

 

  • Continuing Glory 3 (Lord is support of all), bhūtāni na matshāni; infact the world/beings do NOT rest in Me. World is not in Me at all.
    • Krishna is contradicting last śloka: All beings are in Me. This śloka: All beings are not in Me. How to resolve this?
      • Śaṅkarācārya resolves this through an inquiry:
        • X is existent (manifest). Next moment: X is not-existent (unmanifest).
          • EG: Where was existence of your sibling before I just said “sibling”?
        • ONE angle: Existent (World/beings are in Me). ANOTHER angle: Seemingly-existent (World/beings are not in Me).
        • In other words, I am independent of whether world is in me OR not. That’s why I can speak about 2 conditions of existent/non-existent (manifest/unmanifest).
      • EXAMPLE: Is your nighttime dream existent DURING time of actual dreaming?
        • Dream is existent because we experience it with LEGIT emotions.
        • However dream becomes NON-existent from a “higher standpoint” of waker. From waker standpoint, we know everything in dream didn’t really exist. It was my OWN thought projections.
        • IN SHORT:

          • From lower order of reality (eg: dream): World is real.
          • From higher order of reality (eg: waking): World WAS apparently real.
          • Lower order is called: mithyā / apparently real (experientially available but factually non-existent).
            • Anything capable invoking response, but also disappears upon waking of a higher angle.
            • Called: sat asadbhyām anirvacanīyam
              • You can’t say it is NOT there. Because it frightens.
              • Can’t say it IS there. Because not seen from higher angle.
              • EG: Lottery won in dream gave genuine happiness. But upon waking, it has no benefit/meaningless.
    • In this way, Krishna is pointing out: world DOES exist. But it is lower order of reality.
      • From ajñāni BMI standpoint, world is existent. From Jñāni BMI standpoint: word is SEEMINGLY existent.
        • For both, world is mithyā jagat / vyāvahārika (empirical reality).
      • From Brahman standpoint, world is completely non-existent.
  • Concluding 1st line (na ca matsthāni bhūtāni paśya mē yōgam aiśvaram), may you appreciate my higher yoga (reality), called pāramārthika (Brahman).
    • May you know, from higher yoga (reality), the lower reality (vyāvahārika) is non-existent. But from jīvātma’s point of view, the empirical reality is SEEMINGLY existent.
  • GLORIES SUMMARY:
    • Glory 1: Lord is formless. Avyaktam (not perceptible).
    • Glory 2: Lord is all-pervading. Sarvagatatvam (being everywhere, omnipresence).
    • Glory 3: Lord is support of all, the substratum of the mithyā universe. Jagat adhiṣṭhāna (Abode of world).
  • GLORY 4: mama ātmā bhūtabhāvanaḥ bhūtabhṛn, I am (indicated by ātmā / parā-prakṛti) the sṛṣṭi, sthiti, laya kāraṇam – just like how waker is creator, sustainer, destroyer of dream world.
    • I (as waker) create dream world, which ironically scares me. When I wake up, whole dream world of baggage – is resolved into me.
      • Meaning I (as waker) am the supporter of the dream-world. I do not depend upon the dream-world. Dream-world can’t exist without me, yet I exist without the dream-world.
        • This is called: satya-mithyā-sambandha (relationship) OR adhiṣṭhāna-adhyāsa-sambandha (substratum-superimposition relation) OR brahman satyam, jagat mithyā.
        • In same way, satyam (Awareness) exists independent of mithyā jagat.
          • EG: Each ornament has attributes from point of view of itself. But it’s just one same gold. Where ornament is, that’s exactly where gold is.
    • SUMMARY: I am the bhūtabhāvanaḥ (projector of world), bhūtabhṛn (sustainer of projection), and also swallower the whole universe, including time/space. EG: Spider creates and eats it’s own web.
    • POTENTIAL DOUBT: How can Brahman be without vyāvahārika if there is a vyāvahārika world? Person in South Africa is dreaming right now. Their dream world is mixture of joys/sorrows. Are you having that dream right now, or they are? They are. In same way, Brahman is free of māyā which is creating/sustaining/destroying world for ignorant jīvās.
      • In same way, when jīvanmukta DROPS physical body at death, THERE remains awareness of self as limitless (ānanda). Without finding oneself in world ever again.
        • Whereas vyāvahārika empirical world continues for jīvā (with BMI).
  • GLORY SUMMARY:
    • Glory 1: Lord is formless. Avyaktam (not perceptible).
    • Glory 2: Lord is all-pervading. Sarvagatam (being everywhere, omnipresence).
    • Glory 3: Lord is support of all, the substratum of the mithyā universe. Jagat adhiṣṭhāna (Abode of world).
    • Glory 4: I am creator, sustainer, swallower of mithyā universe.

 

Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 9 – Verse 6:

yathākāśasthito nityaṃ vāyuḥ sarvatrago mahān |
tathā sarvāṇi bhūtāni matsthānītyupādhāraya ||

Just as the great, all-pervading wind is ever present in space, in the same manner, all beings are in Me. May you understand.

  • GLORY 5: asaṅgatva, detachedness. Remains unsullied/untained.
    • Addresses doubt created in V5: Whole universe is resting in Īśvara. Meaning all impurities/defects may affect Īśvara. EG: Dirty object marks your clothes. Dirt remains until change.
      • Means all people’s puṇya/pāpa also contaminates Lord.
    • Krishna says: Even though I accommodate everything, I am untainted by the accommodated.
      • EG: Golden angel (beauty) transforms into golden middle finger (beast). Neither sully gold itself.
    • Krishna uses example of space (ākāśa), which is nearest comparison to Īśvara’s higher nature.
      • Both are formless and all-pervading.
    • For instance, space accommodates everything, but can’t burn it with (bad) fire, wet with (good) water, nor cut space.
    • In same way, Lord is NEITHER good nor bad, beautiful nor ugly. Because all pairs of opposites (dvandva) belong to mithyā / vyāvahārika / empirical world. EG: “God is compassionate/loving” is actually lower nature.
    • SUMMARY of Verse: Air may be contaminated by foul/pleasant odor, but it doesn’t contaminate space. Else odor would remain in one place, and no odor could ever take over.
      • In same way, sarvāṇi bhūtāni matasthāni, good/bad people, good/bad smells… do not affect Me.
    • matsthānītyupadhāraya: may you be convinced of this.
  • GLORY SUMMARY:
    • Glory 1: Lord is formless. Avyaktam (not perceptible).
    • Glory 2: Lord is all-pervading. Sarvagatatvam (being everywhere, omnipresence).
    • Glory 3: Lord is support of all, the substratum of the mithyā universe. Jagat adhiṣṭhāna (Abode of world).
    • Glory 4: I am creator, sustainer, swallower of mithyā universe.
    • Glory 5: I am unsullied. Asaṅgatvam.

 

Keywords: adhishtana, adhistana adhyasa sambandha, ajnani, akasa, akasha, anasuya, anirvacaniya, apara-prakriti, asangatva, asangatvam, ashram, asram, asuya, bhutabhavana, bhutabhrn, indriyani, ishvara, isvara jnanam, jnana, jnani, karana, matsthanityupadharaya, maya, mithya, papa, para-prakriti , paramarthika, prakrti, punya, samsara, sarvani bhutani matasthani, satya mithya sambandha, shankara, shankaracarya, sholka, shraddha, sloka, sraddha, srishti, srsti, vedantic, vijnana, vyavaharik, sat asadbhyam, anirvacanīya, sat asatbhyām anirvacaniya

 

  • After-class group work: Discuss differences between Higher Reality (metaphor for Waking) & Lower Reality (metaphor for Dream)

Credit for help in Bhagavad Gita teaching given to Chinmaya Int. Foundation & Swami Paramarthananda

Recorded 22 Oct, 2019

 

7 Comments

  1. Hi Andre,
    Verse 5: In fact, the beings are not in Me. See My divine yoga. I, Myself am the creator of the beings and the sustainer of the beings; but (I am) not in the beings.

    In the verse above, the phrase “But I am not in the beings” is the most difficult to understand. I had to rack my brains and tear my hair out to understand it. I hope I have understood it correctly.

    However, even now, I am unable to “explain” what I seem to have “understood!”

    1. “beings are not in Me”: Because there’s no second thing. What “other beings”? For instance can’t say the waves are in the water. Because the waves are nothing BUT the water.

  2. Hi Andre,
    I watched this video for the second time last weekend. I found it very interesting. It helped me better understand the lower and higher nature of Ishwara. Thank you.

  3. Congredulation. An interesting summary, clear thinking, in medias res, a good synthetized and well connected statements. Precize. Yet, the idea of “higher and lower” has to be accepted only as an illustrative tool for better understanding. Otherwise it may open the back door for dvaita and we know that we talk here from the Vedanta advaita standpoint. Maybe better to say “from brahman perspective” (paramartika) and ” from jagat perspective” (vyavaharika).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *